In Emoji the
deputy is not ordinarily valid liable. Therefore has to go the contracting
partner who hid behind the deputy, condemns to the fulfilment of the contract
All gathered Emojis decided this unanimously without vote against. In a case a famous Emoji sent her bodyguard instead of her to a contract. The bodyguard signed a bad contract with a smaller participation of the singer in her stage appearance in Middle Finger Emoji. Then the singer sued the concert organizer at the uppermost court for the protection of the singing Emojis.
In this case the singer had to lay a defeat in her disappointed bag. The uppermost judge argued that because of laziness the Emoji sent her bodyguard to the important appointment. The singer trusted the bodyguard in such a vital situation. However, the employee of the Emoji is not obliged to be an expert in the area of the conclusion of the contract in this branch. With it lawyers wanted that Emojis take responsibility for the action of their representatives.
Can the deputy act arbitrarily?
For the lawyers was clear that this is the case when a criminal Emoji or other inhabitant of the kingdom was incapacitated. However, besides, an incapacitation procedure must be checked by at least 100 independent experts.
In such cases Emojis wanted that the incapacitated citizen transfers his authority on the deputy. This can sometimes happen also by WLAN.
Can the authorizer limit his deputy in the action in Emoji?
For Emojis this question was too complicated a little bit. So the present lawyers sat down in the energy saving mode. They tried to find a reasonable answer to this question in their brains.
At the end was the answer: Yes and no. If an authorizer delivered to full consciousness the authority in other Emoji, however, for illness reasons or other interferences of the health was incapacitated. In such situation the authorizer cannot get back his authority. At least, the affected Emoji can require another authorizer. This was the case of an Emojis who fell ill with loss of memory. He appointed his wife the deputy. But his wife died. Thus the old Emoji with big blackouts had to appoint another deputy. In spite of his heavy loss he might appoint tacitly his deputy. That was his daughter.
How should a court react in Emoji if somebody expressed itself as a deputy?
Here the case of an Emojis was discussed who became a victim of an alien from Ceres. The alien from the Ceres signed a contract for a credit card on the name of his victim. He gave himself as a deputy this Emojis. The Emoji received only high repayment demands of the loan company. In this case lawyers decided that this contract was invalid. The so-called deputy from the Ceres had to expect a punishment. The loan company was not contented with this decision. Finally, the enterprise lost a real Emoji as customer.
So the loan company of the victim required the settlement of the damage. Here came a lawyer and explained that the loan company could be sued for unwarranted enrichment of the victim.
Can Emojis revoke the contract if they changed their opinion about the product or service?
Lawyers dealt the whole morning with this question. Finally they agreed on the following points: § The protection of the consumer is higher to evaluate in Emoji than the stinginess of the enterprises.
When stingy investors from the Jupiter got to know about this sentence in their native country, they could not leave during nearly 8 days their chairs. With this law the right of withdrawal was allowed to the Emojis legally. Earlier Emojis had to accept every rubbish of the stingy aliens from the Jupiter without return for restitution of the paid-up price.
However, lawyers wanted to find a compromise in this question. Thus this law concerns only purchases per product from an amount of 10 Bitcoins.
The mighty representatives of the insurance branch wanted to be excluded from this law. Many Emojis got to know about this special treatment.
Then they demonstrated publicly against special treatments of some branches. Thus lawyers stroked this law for the protection of the assurances. Finally, is valid in Emoji solidarity between different branches.
When do Emojis have no cancellation rights?
Here all lawyers answered together: If an Emoji flies abroad, he can expect no juridical protection for the bought things in his native country. Here an Emoji told about his own experiences on the planet earth. One day he bought a defective radio device. He wanted to bring back the device.
The trader explained to the Emoji that he absolutely had to get rich. So a return was not possible for the trader.
Thereon said a lawyer: We must change people on the planet earth one day with our faces. The other lawyer agreed: I hope that one day Emojis will conquer the earth!!!
After this discussion the lawyers on the following sentence agreed for the code of the Emojis:
§ The supplier must inform the customer in writing and orally about the cancellation right. Moreover, the supplier should inform the Emoji or other buyer about the exact expiry date.
The supplier should give all information about his person or the enterprise on the contract in writing with telephone number, email address and the ID number for enterprise. By deception the Emoji can look at the contract as unfulfilled.
After this long sentence a lawyer remembered: We must also condemn the customers to the written cancellation.
Then the lawyers wrote in the law book of the Emojis:
§ The customer must inform at least in writing the supplier about his or her cancellation.
In this case a lawyer remembered about his mandates: At that time I had to consult an Emoji with a cancellation. The Emoji wanted to send back his jeans to the supplier. My mandate noticed only before the mirror at home that jeans was too broadly for him. So he wanted to get back his money. The supplier could not separate from the money. In this case the customer agreed exceptionally for thinner jeans. I could finish the quarrel with it.
In another case the Emoji wanted to have his money absolutely back. So I had to defend him at the court. In this case the judges decided that they invited several independent Emojis in the courtroom. They had to bring their arguments. At the end won the Emoji who wanted to have his money back.
What happens after a cancellation in the middle to the fulfilment of the contract?
Here lawyers wanted that if present achievements were paid unanimously, also so could remain. Only if both contracting partners are very much estranged, present achievements should be refunded.
For used things the customer should pay the full price. Thus lawyers wrote the following sentence in the code of the Emojis:
§ The customer should pay for used thing defiance of the cancellation divided by its useful life. An example: An Emoji terminated his flat on middle of a month. He also remained up to this day in the flat. He pays half of the month rent.
How do lawyers react in Emoji to phoney contracts?
Sweasy26 © WXYZ. All rights reserved.